Essay topics: Many countries spend a lot of money in the arts. Some people think investment in the arts is necessary, but others say money is better spent on public services and facilities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
A school of people believe that the arts is worthy of a large amount of government grants, while the opposed argue that common services and infrastructures deserve more of them. Personally, I reckon that we should give top priority to the latter, especially when administrations have a limited budget.
The supporters claim that art funds are of great significance to both ordinary beings and artists. Firstly, these capitals are conducive in cultivating artists. With financial support from the state, they might be less troubled with survival but more devoted to increasing expertise and creating high-quality artworks. Secondly, average people are likely to enhance artistic attainment and aesthetic temperament due to these funds. If more arts institutions (such as museums, art galleries, exhibition halls etc.) are established and refurbished, individuals maybe exposed to arts appreciation and training more often.
Despite this, others argue that governments should put more capitals into public welfare systems. It is public investment that satisfies essential living demands of citizens. For example, improving mass transportation, such as underground railways, highways and train rails, facilitates daily commuting and long-distance traveling. In contrast, arts investment does not necessarily benefit general public in the terms of personal wellbeing.
In conclusion, it is true that investing the arts has countless merits, but I observed that improvement in public facilities is more beneficial to economic advancement and fiscal revenue growth, therefore it should be attached with greater importance. With well-equipped infrastructures, cities can widely attract investments, thereby increasing local wealth. By comparison, arts investment will not yield such instant and tangible returns.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | irisyuki | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | SylviaMazhiqian | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | Dong meichen | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | SylviaMazhiqian | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | SylviaMazhiqian | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
A school of people believe that the arts...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dministrations have a limited budget. The supporters claim that art funds are ...
^^
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'art'.
Suggestion: art
...furbished, individuals maybe exposed to arts appreciation and training more often. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...appreciation and training more often. Despite this, others argue that governme...
^^
Line 5, column 393, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...investment does not necessarily benefit general public in the terms of personal wellbeing. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the terms of personal wellbeing. In conclusion, it is true that investing...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i reckon, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97307692308 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18386046422 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684615384615 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1981167233 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.533333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123091880769 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408947750929 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299873428485 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726028123092 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013002013894 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.05 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.