Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
A good transport infrastructure is important for the development of a country. It is argued that railways should be the top priority of governments rather than roads. This essay will focus on why it is beneficial to all if a country has better trains.
First of all, a new and modern railway system significantly improves the mobility for both people and goods. In other words, it becomes easy for citizens to commute, which in turn leads to fresh and exciting job opportunities. Furthermore, the transport of goods and services also become convenient and more frequent, which paves way for tremendous economic development. Economy experts believe that without improved subways and metros, no prosperous mega-city would have been able to survive. While roads and cars have their fair share in elevating people's standards of living, the railways are the most crucial factor.
Secondly, the trains are much more environment friendly option. Although old trains were considered extremely polluting and hazardous, the newer engines are believed to be a very clean form of transportation. When a city has great rail-network, the number of vehicles on streets drop. Because of this decline in fossil-burning vehicles, the air quality drastically improves. The added benefit of clean air is decrease in number of people getting sick. Some European cities have reported these beneficial outcomes, who have banned cars from city centers.
To summarize, I completely agree with the idea of focusing more on railways than roads. It doesn't only make our lives more convenient but also benefit the atmosphere around us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The fist chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household.The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about energy consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 and with projections until 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant. 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ocusing more on railways than roads. It doesnt only make our lives more convenient but...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding atmosphere'?
Suggestion: the surrounding atmosphere
... lives more convenient but also benefit the atmosphere around us.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30078125 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90200462773 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67578125 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.9830669432 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.8125 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123099508725 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421110432451 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861847750839 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922076121901 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752583842379 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.