Some think that there is no better decision then accepting bad condition, while other think that it it is good for a person to try to promote the situation. However, I think is based on situation that what situation is faced and what is good action against it.
To begins with, accepting worse thing would be good at some situation. Provided that a student failed to achieve his expected score just because of one or two percents marks and if they take it positively, the student would not leave any chance to lose his score in the next term. So, he will increase his study time and put his total attention into study. On this point of view, it is better to accept bad result to achieve a good thing.
On the other hand, someone have lack of money and he is living up for life ,and his daily needs are not fulfilled. At that moment, if he do not take any action against it, he might be got poorer. Nonetheless, suppose that he took attempts to promote the situation through searching for a job or doing some business would be the best decision for for him. Due to earning some money, he could able to remove his poorness and fulfilling his daily demand. In this situation, there is no better option than took attempts to make present situation better.
In a nutshell, both sided strong enough to do. However, it should be best to observe the situation first and take action whether it is is considered to be e tolerate or try to improve it.
- The bar charts illustrate the alterations and differences in the average percentages of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals consumed in the USA. 67
- the graph below shows predictions about the numbers of people who will study three major world languages between 2020 and 2030summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Is it a positive or negative development? 73
- More and more people are relying on the private car as their major means of transportation Describe some of problems over reliance on cars can cause and suggest at least one possible solution
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...g bad condition, while other think that it it is good for a person to try to promote ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...od thing. On the other hand, someone have lack of money and he is living up for l...
^^^^
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ck of money and he is living up for life ,and his daily needs are not fulfilled. A...
^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...re not fulfilled. At that moment, if he do not take any action against it, he migh...
^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: for
...ome business would be the best decision for for him. Due to earning some money, he coul...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 133, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...uation first and take action whether it is is considered to be e tolerate or try to i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nonetheless, so, then, while, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 5.60731707317 589% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45864661654 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33005080452 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545112781955 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1554229796 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2307692308 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14407834073 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571047286523 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512751977997 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889032177974 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133738101473 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.