Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend
Recently, the phenomenon of deducting marks from students' works and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of overdue works are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that modern universities can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, deducting marks can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of overdue assignments, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of hard-working students. Thus, beneficial ramifications of efficient universities are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, deducted marks can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of inefficient works are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described irresponsible students. Hence, predicted outcomes of atrocious assignments are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of deducting marks from students' works far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of responsible students prove the significance of a prestigious university, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- Governments promise continuous economic growth, but it's actually an illusion. Some people think that governments should abandon this. Please talk about the validity and the implications. 85
- What do you think of bidding to host sports events? Is it a blessing or a curse? Give your opinions. 88
- With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universities should only procure digital materials rather than constantly textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give 85
- experience is more effective way to teach, compared to books. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87272727273 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33492351877 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3111262549 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.454545455 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234463798618 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766325336318 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569114934167 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133005792749 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205061200563 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.09 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.