Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life, and a bridge to spread news and awareness and for some it acts like a companion. What is your opinion about this?
Recently, the phenomenon of TV's roles in life and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of spreading news are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that a companion can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the roles of TV in life can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of spreading awareness, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of a brilliant companion. Thus, beneficial ramifications of essential news are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, the roles of TV can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of an inefficient companion are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described time-consuming activities. Hence, predicted outcomes of detrimental news are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of TV's roles in life far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of an excellent bridge prove the significance of spreading news and awareness, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | manraj123 | 72 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | Alireza.r.68 | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-07 | Ekta shah | 72 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | shreyanshpte | 72 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | Nkhatri | 77 | view |
- Hosting sporting events such as the Olympics and the World Cup can bring benefits to the host countries. How far do you agree with this statement? Use your own examples to support. 88
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people s life and work 94
- Whether formal writing examination is a good way to assess students learning? 88
- Poor lifestyles have a negative impact on people's health. List some unhealthy lifestyles and discuss what government services could help? 88
- Which areas of concern should governments allocate funds to? Climate change, education, or public health? Explain your idea with examples. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48245614035 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29290756441 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8542426636 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.636363636 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213049312721 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709912901965 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0274595271094 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119373819139 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132147369605 0.0609392437508 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.