It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature. To what extent you agree? Give example.
Recently, the phenomenon of studying a film to learn literature and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of modern schools are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that agreeing educational films can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning literature at schools can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of important educational films, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of hard-working children. Thus, beneficial ramifications of studying films are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, studying literature by films can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of inefficient schools are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described irresponsible students. Hence, predicted outcomes of time-consuming methods are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that learning literature at schools by studying films far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of sophisticated students prove the significance of an essential study, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | malahat_m | 88 | view |
| 2018-08-04 | bashirheidari | 77 | view |
| 2018-08-04 | Mani.Narimani | 88 | view |
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people s life and work 94
- “More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with statement? 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- In town and cities, the large shopping malls should replace the small local shops 85
- experience is more effective way to teach, compared to books. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83628318584 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3356728157 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650442477876 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.442353014 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.909090909 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241077525761 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786810471517 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053966308275 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135180471322 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036038998675 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.