Governments promise continuous economic growth, but it's actually an illusion. Some people think that governments should abandon this. Please talk about the validity and the implications.
Recently, the phenomenon of continuous economic growth and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of governments' promises are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that an illusion can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, ongoing economic growth can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of efficient governments, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of a valid promise. Thus, beneficial ramifications of abandoning illusions are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, temporary economic growth can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of weak economies are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inefficient governments. Hence, predicted outcomes of an atrocious illusion are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of continuous economic growth far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of abandoning impossible promises prove the significance of a sophisticated government, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-31 | Maheswari | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | Nasir-RZN | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-18 | neelu sharma | 77 | view |
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people s life and work 94
- In today’s world, different government and international organization are confronting many problems. What is the most pressing problem among them? 88
- Some people think that younger employees often have more skills, knowledge and motivation than the old employees. To what extent do you agree with it? Use your experience. 80
- Which areas of concern should governments allocate funds to? Climate change, education, or public health? Explain your idea with examples. 88
- Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85972850679 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33007696363 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660633484163 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.924839783 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.727272727 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226860473688 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697458535787 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0230244109561 0.071462118173 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119433713294 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327911055586 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.2 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.