topic
The chart illustrates how often people in the USA went to fast food establishments from 2003 to 2013,
Overall, people who ate in fast food restaurants once a week and once or twice a month accounted for the highest percentages, whereas people who either never ate in these restaurants or went every day showed
the lowest figures throughout the whole period.
In 2003 the number of individuals who ate in fast food establishments once a week and once or twice a
month accounted for 31% and 30% respectively. For those in the once a week group this figure increased
slightly but then dropped to around 27% in 2013. The once or twice a month category declined to 25%
then rose to approximately 33% by 2013.
Conversely, the figure for people who either ate at fast-food eateries every day or never stood at under
5% throughout the ten year period. Several times a week category accounted for 17% in 2003, rose in
2006, then settled back to around 16% in 2013, The few times a year group rose slightly and leveled off at
15% from 2006 to 2013.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... restaurants or went every day showed the lowest figures throughout the whole per...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Month
...ments once a week and once or twice a month accounted for 31% and 30% respectively....
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Slightly
...ce a week group this figure increased slightly but then dropped to around 27% in 2013....
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Then
...wice a month category declined to 25% then rose to approximately 33% by 2013. Co...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71122994652 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64905126764 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48128342246 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.8789309139 43.030603864 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 146.833333333 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1666666667 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.