In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Presidential elections in the democratic society has become a essential ritual that symbolizes the publics participation in politics. Dominant coteries are changed periodically. This tradition, although it can prevent dictatorship, can be confusing and might even hamper a long term plan that is propitious for the society.
Admittedly, changing leaders may help obviate from a single power to dominate. Since a perpetual power is prone to corruption, interchange of power every 5 years is a sound way to prevent it. North Korea for example, is a epitome of dictator ship and it is widely known for the corrupted government, does not provide financial support for their penurious citizens while the government officials maintain extravagant life-styles. On the other hand, South Korea practicing democracy only allows 5 years of power which is not enough time to take advantage of the power to oneself, obviously leading to a relatively clear government.
Nevertheless, a mercurial state of power may also engender chaos and it may deteriorate efficiency of the leaders. Any profession requires a time of adaption and considering the importance of the jobs, it may take 1 or even 2 years to fully understand the job and one's role: after this adaption, the individual has only 3~4 years to work. In contrast, if power is maintained for a prolonged time, the time spent for adjusting would be significantly decreased, enabling a effective governing of the citizens. For instance, in Rome there was a time when kings were assassinated every year or two, and this situation made the society very unstable and anxious. Thus, 5 years may be too short to stabilize the public after changes of dominance.
Last but not least, there are some plans that require a long term to accomplish. Education for example, needs more than 5 years to actually assess the results of a plan. If the Educational Minister changes frequently, students will be exasperated and confused by the convoluted curriculum. For instance, Korean Education has suffered capricious change due to the numerous supplant in educational power. This caused the students preparing for university entrance exams to study 2 or even more unnecessary curriculums to take the exam: this lead to countless protests of parents who are zealous when it comes to their children's education. Therefore, in some disciplines where a long sighted legislation is required, the leaders should not be frequently changed.
In conclusion, preventing corruption may be accomplished by substitution of power every few years. Nonetheless, the leaders themselves may experience difficulty in understanding their occupations which would be detrimental to work efficiency not to mention the abashment it may cause to the public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | meghanajilla | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-08 | er.vprashant | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | hj84 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | hj84 | 16 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing."During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter 61
- The city of Winston has two large department stores: Namen and Roscoe. Namen is known for its high-end designer fashions, while Roscoe is known for more affordable fashion options. Both Namen and Roscoe are each considering opening another store in the gr 49
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit 62
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should 75
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ns in the democratic society has become a essential ritual that symbolizes the pu...
^
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
... a essential ritual that symbolizes the publics participation in politics. Dominant cot...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...prevent it. North Korea for example, is a epitome of dictator ship and it is wide...
^
Line 9, column 265, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...2 years to fully understand the job and ones role: after this adaption, the individu...
^^^^
Line 9, column 470, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ld be significantly decreased, enabling a effective governing of the citizens. Fo...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2344.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36384439359 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12812887626 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574370709382 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8863370977 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.2 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.85 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152444874999 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448651235658 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0239635575234 0.0758088955206 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.082176052338 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224051635496 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 100.480337079 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.