The bar chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in the American employment rate of seven distinct categories in 2003 and 2013.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that 2013 witnessed a higher figure for all fields with notable exception of that of medical, business and unemployment.
More specifically, business in 2003 accounted for roughly 50% of the job market, whereas less than 5% of adults taking part in the hotel employment. However, 2013 showed a significant increase in the employment rate of hotel industry with a gap of over 15% compared to the figure in 2003. The same situation also occurred with those who self employed with a rise of 20% which was as twice as that of building employment. People working in educational system had a tendency of rising and reached approximately 20% which was equal to that of hotel industry and building fields in 2013. Medical, however, experienced the opposite trend with a dramatic drop from 20% in 2003 to 10% in 2013.
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 67
- Some people think planning future is a waste of time and people should focus on the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 69
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 Measured in tonnes 84
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 84
- The graph shows the percentage of overweight men and women in Australia between 1980 and 2010. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76821429456 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582352941176 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.4759689911 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231962694209 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108163922143 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835994416695 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158898579704 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954741254304 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.