The line chart illustrates how much electricity obtained from various sources (coal, natural gas, and petroleum) to supply New York City over two decades, from 1980 to 2000.
Overall, electricity from petroleum was by far the largest production among other types. Additionally, natural gas exploitation for electricity experienced the most significant increase, while the opposite was true for coal throughout the observed period.
In 1980, about 350 million kWh of electricity was produced from petroleum. The figure reached a peak of 600 million KWh in 1985 before decreasing sharply to under 400 million KWh in 1990. From then on, however, it increased substantially to a level of above 700 million KWh at the final research year.
In 1980, only 1000 million kWh of electricity was created. This figure remained stable during the first five years before rising significantly to approximately 450 million kWh in 1995. In addition, it experienced a slight rise of 50 million KWh by 2000.
In contrast, the figure for coal exploitation witnessed a converse trend, with roughly 200 million KWh produced in 1980, reaching a peak of over 300 million kWh in 1985. On the other hand, however, it dropped rapidly and remained constant at 200 million KWh during the last decade.
- It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 87
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 92
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 78
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 84
- The table shows the expenditure on various types of food in one European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23300970874 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85203986611 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582524271845 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8948572096 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161485999362 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759174570392 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925706753855 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112179939057 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104413186096 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.