Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.
The prompt says that Science and technology can one day solve all of society's problems. Personally I believe that the two would be able to solve problems but not all. I feel this way for two reasons, which I explore in the following essay.
First reason, any solution to a problem will in turn create problems of a different nature. As these are problems that come along with the solution unseen. For instance, last year, a social networking platform called Facebook was involved in a scandal of leaking user's data to third party sources causing problems to trivial things such as privacy, security and trust.
Second reason, the statement is rather audacious in assuming that society would be able to reach a place where no problems would arise. This is phantasmagorical as problems should be present to drive people to make better solutions and innovations. Moreover, there should be a balance between good and bad. For example, the co-founder of Alibaba had numerous obstacles from being rejected by various companies to universities, this did not hinder his strife to be the best but it further fuelled him to do better.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that Science and technology cannot solve all of society's problem. This is because every solution has its own nature of problems that comes with it , and because the statement is rather not realistic.
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. 70
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 63
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville:"Over the past three years, there has been a marked increase in cases of 'sidewalk rage,' similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road, but instead among sidew 50
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why? 70
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had litt 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... create problems of a different nature. As these are problems that come along with...
^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'users'' or 'user's'?
Suggestion: users'; user's
...ok was involved in a scandal of leaking users data to third party sources causing pro...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 182, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...wn nature of problems that comes with it , and because the statement is rather not...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, so, third, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 58.6224719101 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 2235.4752809 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 230.0 442.535393258 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97826086957 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.55969084622 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67310321197 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626086956522 0.4932671777 127% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 704.065955056 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3268576831 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4166666667 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.21951772744 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284631068277 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116063154496 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157567572655 0.0758088955206 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184091490015 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151900498357 0.0667264976115 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.