People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of building advanced transport systems and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of building new roads are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that non-overcrowded cities can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social stand point, emphasizing governments to build sophisticated transport systems can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of agreeing advanced transport networks, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of modern cities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of decreasing air pollution are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, building new roads for vehicles can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of overcrowded metropolises are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inefficient governments. Hence, predicted outcomes of increasing air pollution are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of emphasizing governments to build advanced transport systems far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of sustainable networks prove the significance of a contemporary city, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | viviana | 72 | view |
| 2019-06-11 | Nasir-RZN | 88 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | zjaved | 88 | view |
- “More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with statement? 85
- combining education and work 85
- Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend 85
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 11
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work, some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91914893617 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34197280875 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659574468085 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.048623599 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.454545455 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341778612662 0.242375264174 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917707660349 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745225721252 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173217897154 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224006354107 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.13 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.