The ever-growing population indeed causes quite crowds in major cities, and this phenomenon demands the globe to build multi-storey buildings in order to provide habitations and offices for the public. However, some people oppose this as it causes physical hazards, along with social issues. In my view, skyscrapers have both advantages and disadvantages which would be outlined in this essay.
To begin with, it is often said that skyscrapers can utilise an optimum land for their constructions, where a maximum number of people can live, and the rest of the land could be utilised for infrastructure development such as healthcare education and transportation which fulfil the fundamental needs of the communities. For instance, in Beijing, China, they erect multi-storey constructions to combat the ever-growing population, as well as implementing basic amenities for its nationals. Furthermore, skyscrapers might accommodate the tight security for residence while installing CCTV surveillance, security guard frisking newcomers to easier identification of burglar, crimes which can safeguard the tenants. For example, some main towns in India such as Mumbai, New Delhi, Bangalore and Hyderabad have substantial security breach at multi-storey apartments.
However, skyscrapers also have drawbacks such as these are incredibly prone to earthquakes and other natural calamities. Tallest buildings might not be secure from natural disasters compared to single-storey houses; hence, catastrophic circumstances can be seen like infrastructural destruction, inhabitation collapse. Vijayawada city, India, for instance, is alerted to city dweller not to construct tallest apartments as it is highly prone to tsunami and earthquake. Besides, it leads to communication impairments among rented people due to fear of privacy revealing; therefore, they make barriers between each family. To illustrate, major cities of the globe follow this phenomenon, nowadays. Thus, skyscrapers are not suitable for natural disaster-prone geographical locations, and it causes inadequate communication among inhabitants.
In conclusion, it seems, skyscrapers have some benefits like optimum land utilisation, providing high security and drawbacks: unable to protect the natural calamities, along with impairment of communication in tenants. So, it has both merits and demerits which should be taken into consideration when establishing multi-storey apartments.
- Going overseas for university study is an exciting prospect for many people But while it may offer some advantages it is probably better to stay home because of the difficulties a student inevitably encounters living and studying in a different culture 89
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students PhD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university 67
- Employer sometimes ask people apply for jobs personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. 61
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- the pie graph below shows how electricity is produced in ireland and the table shows the primary reasons for using electricity in the same country 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Tallest'.
Suggestion: The Tallest
...rthquakes and other natural calamities. Tallest buildings might not be secure from natu...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'construct the tallest'.
Suggestion: construct the tallest
...ance, is alerted to city dweller not to construct tallest apartments as it is highly prone to tsu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07803468208 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39259211306 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618497109827 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1128646213 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.2 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109948636737 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379763297127 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374616432007 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680076066213 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411412988054 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.28 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.