The pie chart depicts the factors responsible for land degradation worldwide. The table, on the other hand, gives a regional breakdown of this degradation during the 1990s.
Referring to pie chart, the principle factor responsible for unproductive land is over-grazing, which contributed almost 35% to land degradation. In addition, deforestation and over-cultivation accounted for 30% and 28% respectively. Other reasons are considerably lower at 7%.
It is quite illusive from the table that Europe had the highest deforestation rate of 9.8% followed by Oceania and North America with 1.7% and ...
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: rivaiw
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 70
- School concentrated far too much on traditional subjects which do noy adequate prepare students for the realistic demands of the modern worldDo you agree or disagree 73
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing their level of fitness is decreasing .What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 46
- The pie chart shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive and the table shows these affected three regions of the world during 1990s. 93
- Even though globalization effect the world’s economies in very positive way, its negative side shouldn’t be forgotten. Discuss. 78
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 10
No. of Words: 186 200
No. of Characters: 993 1000
No. of Different Words: 106 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.693 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.339 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.365 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 67 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 55 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 43 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.909 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.302 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.455 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.406 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.638 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.105 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4