The tables below show the results of a survey of urban residents’ opinions related to various aspects of life in 1980 and 2010.
The tables compare the data of how residents in an urban area assessed six different aspects relating to their life in the years 1980 and 2010.
Generally, most people had good opinions about all the categories in the list. Apart from that, education and healthcare were the most highly ranked. On the other hand, shops, transport system, environment and accommodation received the highest negative feedback.
As can be seen from the table, in 1980, 82% of responded said that education was good, while 75% and 72% of people rated the shop and environment as also being good. Meanwhile, only 54% and 56% of the surveyed individuals said they were satisfied with the transport system and accommodation. However, they were the two aspects having the greatest number of neutral ideals, 31% for the former and 34% for the later. Regarding negative feedback, 14% of residents in here both thought the shops and transport system were bad, which was double the number for negative feedback about education, at a mere 6%.
Over the three decades ensuing, there were considerably changed in all of the indexes. Details, the positive opinions of healthcare service and shops increased, to 83% and 81%, in turn holding the top ranks. By contrast, thinking regarding the environment and accommodation decreased, with the amount of negative minds climbing to 20% and 18% respectively, much higher than that of healthcare with at only 7%. Finally, the middle opinions related to all categories dropped significantly over the 30 years period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-15 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2020-02-06 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2020-02-06 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2020-02-05 | thenaolayeu122 | 79 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Bui Quang | 74 | view |
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree of disagree 56
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints and passengers 89
- The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2006 84
- The graph below shows the population of particular country by age group starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 88
- The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 68, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ing, there were considerably changed in all of the indexes. Details, the positive opinions...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, regarding, so, while, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14859437751 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74420935589 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606425702811 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9133610322 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.833333333 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154271864506 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527482218772 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900751261202 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118697872384 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12883909051 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.