Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology but some people have not benefited at all. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true to say that new technologies have had an influence on modern society, while there are others who think that they do not benefit everyone. Personally, I agree that the differences of access to technology between urban and rural areas are evident.
On the one hand, the impact that technology has had on people who are living in inner-cities had clear advantages. Firstly, the Internet allows business people in different countries to interact without ever meeting each other. This creates business opportunities for many individuals thus boosting many economies from the increased profits that are earned when goods and services are exchanged online. Secondly, services like Skype create new possibilities for relationships between students and teachers. This improves education in most nations because learners from poor backgrounds would be able to get access to professional educators for free and this will improve their academic performance. For example, a student can take video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country. Finally, many urban people use social networks, like Facebook, to make new friends and find people who share common interests, and they interact through their computers rather than face to face.
On the other hand, rural communities suffer the most without access to the Internet. One problem is that challenges mostly happen when rural communities have a lower understanding of scientific knowledge. In other words, they might have rigid thinking against the benefits of the newest technology. Another key factor is that many students live far from school, and it is not cost-effective for telecommunication providers to lay fiber in the remote areas where they live. Although satellite is an alternative, slow speed and the expensive price is really limiting students to do their work.
In conclusion, technology has certainly merits towards central cities, whereas the outer-city still needs development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-23 | grahamoneil | 89 | view |
| 2020-02-08 | Christina.fyy | 89 | view |
| 2020-02-08 | Christina.fyy | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tween urban and rural areas are evident. On the one hand, the impact that technol...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 987, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir computers rather than face to face. On the other hand, rural communities suf...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... limiting students to do their work. In conclusion, technology has certainly ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, thus, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53947368421 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99451252513 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634868421053 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2598577818 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.538461538 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3846153846 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16740087267 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558936653183 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549656082741 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101236986331 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606882051053 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.