The table shows the percentage of literacy and employment in different countries in the 1990s and 2010s. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table chart compares five different countries, namely USA, China, UK, Australia and India in terms of the proportion of literacy and employment between 1990 and 2010.
In general, there was a considerable increase in the percentage of literate people in different countries over the period shown. In addition, the proportion of employees in USA and India saw the most dramatic growth from 1990 to 2010.
The most dramatically rise in literate population was seen in China. The percentage of literacy in China was the lowest in the 1990s, at 42%, whereas the figure for China was over 90% in the 2010s. By contrast, USA witnessed the lowest rate of increase in literacy from 1990 to 2010, which was only around 20%. The proportion of Australian who could read and write was the highest in the 2010s, which went up from 49% in the 1990s to 95% in the 2010s. Similarly, that of UK and India rose by around 30% during this period.
Throughout the period shown, the percentage of workers in USA, India and Australia experienced an upward trend, while the figure for China and UK saw a downward trend. Both the figure for employment in USA and India went up rapidly by 40% from 1990 to 2010 compare with the figure for Australian workers, which increased minimally by 2% over the same period. The proportion for UK was the highest employment in the 1990s, which stood at almost 80%, before falling to 60% in the 2010s. The figure for Chinese employees declined slightly by about 5% over the period shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-12 | nguyenphthao99@gmail.com | 58 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The maps below show how the town of Billiton developed over a given period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of difficulties of living in city How can government make urban life better for everyone 67
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than that of young people in many countries in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, whereas, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75572519084 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52182363167 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461832061069 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2916433892 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.833333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118342957939 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506641463263 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484104051688 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872871140385 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236500189325 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.