Cinema attendance by age group
The line graph describes the percentage of people in four different age group went to cinema from 1984 to 2000.
Overall, all of four age group saw the increase trends despite some fluctuations during the survey period. Age group of 15-24 held the highest proportion during this period.
In 1984, only 16% of 15-24-year-old men and women attended the cinema, compared to only 10% of those aged 7-14. The figure then climbed to its peak of 58%, which was also the highest point of the whole graph and dropped down to about 55% in 2000. During the same time, age group of 7-14 increased to 32%.
At the beginning of the survey, only 1% people who were over 35 years old showed up at the cinema. This then steadily increased to 14% at the end of the period, although it remained the lowest proportion among four groups. Age group of 25-35, started with about 4%, experienced a sharper increase even though it fluctuated more than the over 35s. This group finished at the same figure with 7-14-year-old attendance at 32%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | Zahid6400 | 56 | view |
| 2024-07-09 | Sajib Ahamed | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-20 | MinyiChu | 70 | view |
| 2024-03-20 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2023-12-04 | vuongthaolinh | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information about oil production capacity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 78
- Cinema attendance by age group 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71666666667 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41008042487 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594444444444 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.6465007658 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.9 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355735200925 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144357500624 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891260024885 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234316567812 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353529944699 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.