People are consuming more and more sugar-based drinks. Why? What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption?
It is definitely true that the consumption of sugary drinks has dramatically increased in recent years. The properties found in such drinks are responsible for this, and various actions can be taken to deal with this situation.
One of the major reasons why manufacturers make sugar-sweetened beverages is due to their highly addictive ingredients - sugar and caffeine - which are prevalent in the majority of such drinks. Based on recent scientific research, these substances can elevate energy levels as well as enhance mood, which are both very effective for people who do not have time to cook nutritious meals for themselves. Consequently, more and more customers, especially children, choose carbonated drinks as their instant energy boosters. Another reason for the popularity of such beverages is that they are becoming more readily available. It takes customers only a few minutes to purchase a carbonated drink from a supermarket, a store, or a vending machine. This kind of drink is so ubiquitous that there is little incentive for sweet-toothed people to give up their favorite drinks in the long term.
Several measures can be implemented to counter this problem. One of these is to impose higher taxes on unhealthy drinks with a high sugar content so that they become unaffordable and less appealing to customers. An additional solution would be to reduce the vast amount of advertising for high-sugar beverages that mostly target children. Educational campaigns should also be run in schools and companies to raise awareness about the health risks associated with the excessive consumption of such drinks.
In conclusion, a lot of factors have contributed to the trend towards increased consumption of sugary drinks. In turn, and due to their negative impact, several approaches must be taken to mitigate the consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-03 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | vuhungbo | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | huy12345 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | trần thị như minh | 84 | view |
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both the 61
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 72
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, well, in conclusion, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36206896552 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03597580522 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610344827586 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3524990285 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.071428571 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323676276286 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977710431194 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483333217421 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170339820141 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619846717465 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, well, in conclusion, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36206896552 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03597580522 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610344827586 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3524990285 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.071428571 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323676276286 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977710431194 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483333217421 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170339820141 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619846717465 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.