Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on public transportation.
The government’s budget is an important source that comes from a wide array of sources, such as income taxes, etc. This money can spend on different areas and owing to the fact that people pay for it, they expected that it spends on useful aspects that can improve their lives. So tough responsibility is spending the budget that the government has taken. In this topic, there are some debates as to how the government should spend its budget. Many individuals convinced that the government should spend more money on improving access to the internet than on public transportation. Personally, I am in favor of this notion. In the following paragraphs, two reasons will be discussed to corroborate my idea.
The first reason is that it can improve people’s communication. One of the most benefits that the new technologies, such as the internet bring to our lives is easy communication. Using the internet provides better communication to the points that people can talk to each other from all over the world. People can find a lot of friends in different countries that help them to be a more sociable person and also, bring them more opportunities for working or studying. Consider a 20-year-old student who studies abroad. For the application process, she used the internet and connected with the professors and the university. Now, the best and also, cheapest way to stay in touch with her parents or friends is the internet. Not only can she talk to them, but also, she can see them by video call.
The second reason is that the internet brings more information to people. There are lots of information on the internet that people use them in their everyday life. If someone has a small question about anything, s/he will search it on the internet and find the answer easily. Also, it helps students to solve their problems independently and expedite their searching process. Several years ago, people had to go to the library and study a huge book to find something that kept in their minds. Nowadays, people, especially students use the Google search engine to solve their problems by reading an article or watching a video. For instance, I have been working on my thesis for 1 year. At first, I did not know anything about my thesis’s topic; so, I started searching on the internet and reading many articles. Now, I can say that thanks to the many web sites, I am really good at it.
As I mentioned in the latest paragraphs, I totally agree with spending money on the internet. I believe the internet has amended our lives and it is hard to imagine our lives without it. So, it will be a viable investment for the government.
- Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on public transportation 70
- cedar 40
- sea otters declining 75
- book reading declining 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 645, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the cheapest'.
Suggestion: , the cheapest
...d the university. Now, the best and also, cheapest way to stay in touch with her parents o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, so, as to, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2185.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77074235808 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73426353147 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515283842795 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.460733904 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.9259259259 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.962962963 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.59259259259 5.45110844103 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223020242738 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625177403413 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960404000156 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142600290994 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924904102454 0.0645574589148 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.