Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught.
To what extent do you agree/disagree?
In these days, beside teaching students theoretical knowledge, whether they should be provided with some soft skills has aroused people's discussion. I contend that these young generations should be improved in both academic and practical knowledge.
There are some reasons why people support for opinion of only teaching student academic subjects. Firstly, since they access to any compulsory subjects at schools or universities, they can gain their deeper insight into every area of specialisation. In fact, learners have opportunity to explore new phenomenon and hidden messages around them, which they are likely to broaden their horizons in many fields of study. Second, by examination results, they are supposed to be eligible for which academic levels they stand. This means that without a deep understanding, students may fail their exams, have to study these subjects again, which they are not able to have better academic performances.
However, i am in favor the idea that practical skills are of great benefit for students to learn. First of all, some practical ones such as cooking , sewing or other skills provide learners fundamental skills, help them to realize their potential and strengths. As a result, they find it so effective and amusing after many hours of studying academic lessons. Moreover, with a few extracurricular activities held by schools, students may have great experiences, apply some theories that they have been equipped to the real life. For instance, college students live far from family, life skills such as cooking and self-confidence will be helpful since students will be able to prepare healthy meals and cope with difficulties.
In conclusion, notwithstanding all the merits of only teaching students academic knowledge offer, I believe both theoretical and practical one should be equally important and be taught at school.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-13 | hieu13092006 | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-23 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | Trangdodo | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-03 | supermanminh512 | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | Nguyen Hung | 56 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 2001 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught To what extent do you agree disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...tter academic performances. However, i am in favor the idea that practical ski...
^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...all, some practical ones such as cooking , sewing or other skills provide learners...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45360824742 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87746850792 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4032875181 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.076923077 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298925762054 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104505145548 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668727852285 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195990627786 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488664909702 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.