Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Many attributes and qualities make up an effective leader: George Washington is known for his adamant truth; Mahtma Ghandi is known for peace and wisdom; Even Adolph cannot be denied his incredible charisma. All three, and essentially every leader, garnered the respect of their peers. It is evident in areas outside of government; such as science, religion, or finance. The level of respect in a person by peers determines the leader's effectiveness.
A leader who is respected by his peers is valued by any who meet him or her. However, the leader's moral judgement may not always mix with people outside of the leader's followers. Genghis Khan is known for his war mongering and ruthless ways, conquering vast tracts of land and killing thousands, if not millions, of people. Khan would be seen to have poor moral judgement, especially in comparison to someone like Jesus Christ in whose name several crusades were levied, also killing thousands of people. Both are considered great leaders for the respect of their peers, but only one possibly for his moral judgement.
Moral judgement does play a strong role in the role of a leader. It historically indicates a leader that is loved by their people and develops a strong bond. However, it is not strong moral judgement that develops an unorthodox theory of relativity or guided the people of Israel through the desert for 40 years. It is the respect of the leaders that is effective. Moses known for his moral judgement; avoiding conflict with Ramses for as long as possible and protecting the slaves, that for a while, he was a tyrant of. But the people of Israel did not know who he was at first or his moral values, he came out of hiding as a stranger. No, they followed him out of sheer respect garnered by his step-brother.
It is easily apparent that regardless of area of expertise, knowledge, or, especially, moral judgement, it is the respect from peers that determines the effectiveness of a leader.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 57
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 58
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The resul 44
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ect in a person by peers determines the leaders effectiveness. A leader who is respe...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 335.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88358208955 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72042348596 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540298507463 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5289557661 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2352941176 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.17647058824 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287219313587 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108634875391 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687064969953 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193846232033 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189873375105 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.