The provided line graph illustrates the number of crime incidence in Newport city centre between 2003 and 2012. The crime was categorized into burglary, car theft and robbery. Overall, burglary increased over the given period, despite some fluctuation, car theft and robbery remained relatively unchanged.
The number of burglaries started at the recorded period with just under 3,500 incidents. There was a slight rise in 2004, and then it decreased dramatically and fell to just above 1,000 incidents in 2008. After that, it increased negligibly and remained relatively stable until 2012.
On the contrary, the changing rates in car theft and robbery had a similar trend. Car theft rates began with approximately 2,900 incidents in 2003 and then stayed at this relative figure until 2005. There was then some fluctuation from 2005 to 2011 and reached 2,800 incidents in 2012. According to the number of robberies rates, it started nearly 700 incidents and then fluctuated and ended up with the same figure in 2012 by 2003.
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales in various formats of films from a particular store between 2002 to 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the way people of Somecountry invested their money during the years 2001 2006 Write a report for a university tutor describing the information shown Write at least 150 words 100
- Some people think that students who don t take a break in studies between the high school and the university are at disadvantage compared to students who travel and work after high school before further continuing their education Do you agree or disagree 79
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990 73
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set u 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23952095808 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61342776088 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59880239521 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1865043228 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141285094154 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622753197909 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862217390161 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991061262747 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670375885869 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.