Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It would be argued that undergraduates should only have a concentration on which subjects that will help them to pursue their future, such as science and technology. In my opinion, however, I believe that university learners have the right to study what they like.
On the one hand, there are numerous reasons why some think that it is not necessary to allow students to choose their favorites. Firstly, if students are distracted by many things, they may devote insufficient time to studying deeply their primary majors. With two important subjects like science and technology, which demand concentration to understand, distraction may create a knowledge hole in students. This is likely to result in poor academic performance, leading to difficulties in seeking a secured job. Moreover, caring about several subjects simultaneously may put students in a high risk of stress or mental health problems. Therefore, undergraduate learners only should build up their knowledge on certain subjects.
On the other hand, I would argue that studying preferred subjects is also beneficial for university students because of several reasons. The first reason is that people are different in their preferences. For example, males may be interested in science, while arts or humanity-based subjects can be more appealing to females. Therefore, learners have their own right to study whatever they are fond of. Another reason is that there are some subjects, foreign languages, for example, which will benefit students' future, besides science and technology. Learning new languages brings individuals more employment possibilities due to the increasingly international incorporation in recent years.
In conclusion, I believe that students should be allowed to follow their preferences instead of only focusing on certain subjects that are considered to benefit their future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-19 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 67 | view |
| 2020-02-28 | Emmaaa | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 77
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
- The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 73
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15 year olds spend chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57394366197 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06399338207 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591549295775 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0897915506 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.533333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303811368924 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944280450961 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566098347131 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197707079727 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430262297247 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.