Students learn more from their school teachers than from other sources such as the internet or television.
To what extent you agree or disagree with this statement?
Despite the increase in alternative sources of educational content like the internet and television, some people argue that students still learn more from their school teachers. While I do feel that these alternative sources play a greater part than they used to, I agree that school teachers are nonetheless the primary source of learning.
Looking at other sources of learning, it is easy to see their increasingly important role. The internet, in particular, has become home to a wealth of learning opportunities with websites like Kahn Academy and Codecademy that have made it possible to study with nothing other than a computer and an internet connection. Television, while less academically oriented, gives viewers insight into the world and culture around them through educational content in a way that was not previously possible.
Having acknowledged the prevalence of alternative sources, teachers still play the most important role in a child’s education. They painstakingly plan out lessons that are optimized to provide the best experience possible and help teach social norms that will allow their students to function well in the workplace after they finish their schooling. Combining this with the sheer amount of time that students spend in school with their teachers, it is easy to deduce that students learn more from teachers than other sources.
Overall, while other sources like the internet and television have been playing a growing part in the education of students, teachers still deserve to be recognized as the primary contributor to student learning. Not only do they spend their lives helping students learn in the most effective way possible, but they also help prepare a child for society by teaching them lessons that will serve them after they finish their schooling.
(~280 words)
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-29 | clarkkent159 | 78 | view |
- The charts show the distribution of employment among agriculture industry CN and services in three countries in 1980 and 2020 85
- Some employers find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as the ability to work with colleagues as a team.What are the causes of this problem?What are some solutions? 73
- Today people are surrounded by all kinds of advertising. This affects what people think is important and has a negative impact on people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Students learn more from their school teachers than from other sources such as the internet or television To what extent you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- In many cities there is little control over the design and construction of new houses Some people think that people can choose to build houses in their own styles instead of building them with the same as the old house style in local areas Do the advantag 39
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...theless the primary source of learning. Looking at other sources of learning, it...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...them after they finish their schooling. ~280 words
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...finish their schooling. ~280 words
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, nonetheless, so, still, well, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34948096886 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72700364721 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560553633218 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.120251286 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.545454545 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341332685485 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126627815267 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116944834195 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216047936164 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681957887824 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.