The graph below shows the US consumers' average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services
The line graph compares the average spending on cell phone and domestic phone services per year (in dollars) of people in the US over 9 years from 2001.
Overall, handset service experienced a rise in its expenditure, while residential phone service showed an opposite trend during the period surveyed.
As can be seen from the graph, in the year 2001, the amount of money spent on local phones was relatively high, closed to 700 dollars, which was over tripled that of cell phones. Over the following 5 years, spending on cell phones soared to approximately 550 dollars, surpassed residential service to become the most popular service with the Americans. During the same period, there was a significant fall by around 200 dollars in the amount of money spent on local phones. That figure decreased continuously for the rest of the period.
By 2010, American residents spent nearly 800 dollars on handsets, compared to a mere 400 dollars of local service.
- Obesity is a problem in many developed countries and some people believe that a tax on fast food could reduce the problem DO you think this will be possible 84
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station 73
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 84
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption between 1955 and 2012 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9875 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60240273593 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61875 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1906286199 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292664666376 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125235425502 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121860568373 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177853947936 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117623385302 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.