Some people think that strict punishments for driving offenses are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It would be argued by some that strict punishment should be imposed to minimize traffic accidents. In my opinion, however, besides that resolve, there are other efficient measures that can be implemented to protect residents.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why individuals hold the belief that driving offenses should be punished hard. The main reason, however, is that punishment may discourage drivers from being careless, such as using phones or drinking alcoholic beverages while driving. A good example of that is the introduction of the latest fine to Vietnamese people who have high levels of alcohol while riding motorbikes. Because of that, residents consume less alcoholic drinks, which leads to a drop in expected traffic accident numbers. Being compared to a couple of years ago, beer and wine are the main reasons resulting in the high rates of accidents and even other criminal convictions, such as murder cases.
On the other hand, I would argue that other actions may have a contribution to road safety. First of all, the causes of an increasing number of accidents should be considered. One of the main reasons is the high levels of private vehicles. The government should put more resources into the improvement of the public transport system to courage people to use buses and trains to commute. This way also helps to protect air quality. Besides, the peak-hour toll should be charged to discourage individuals from travelling in rush hours. Moreover, raising awareness of citizens plays an important role in this matter. This could be done by running regular campaigns about the detrimental effects on health and life without driving responsibilities.
In conclusion, I believe that in addition to strict regulations, other feasible actions could be taken to mitigate traffic problems.
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 73
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station 73
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 84
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'commuting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: commuting
... courage people to use buses and trains to commute. This way also helps to protect air qua...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24315068493 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79831824612 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602739726027 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1320391092 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6875 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25694039635 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754322262906 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628872288832 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167873935477 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446180154152 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.