Topic: Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team.
What are the causes? Can you suggest some possible solutions?
Many managers nowadays find that newly-hired staff are deficient in fundamental soft skills such as teamwork. There are seversl possible reasons behind this problem whose solutions are also mentioned in the following essay.
First, lack of interpersonal skills in new emplyees is attributed to the improper training during the time at university. Tertiary education could place concentration on the academic pogress in order to train students how to achieve the best results of the theoretical major rather than equip them with necessary lifeskills applied for the future career. As a consequence, many fresh graduates are getting in troubles to collaborate effectively with the colleagues despite having extensive expertise. In the second place, teenagers today spend too much time on social networks surfing facebook or even keeping eyes glued to the screen. This causes the lack of face to face interaction and the isolation of the real world. Therefore, ability to communicate with the partners becomes worsen as well.
Thee are some solutions that can be implemented by universities and every individual to address this problem. For instance, universities should encourage pupils to take part in clubs developing communication skills or workshops specializing in job-related skills. All of these activities will count towards overall GPA instead of only compulsary subjects so as to ensure that they are well- equipped to be ready for participating in workforce. Also, every citizen should have a limitation on the time spent for no-worthy things. Instead, investing time join hands in social projects is a wiser choice to acquire new competence for buiding up a strong relationship with co-workers in the long run.
All things considered, a shortage of basic interpersonal skills in new employees is due to the education system and our own and there are a number of feasible suggestions to tackle this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-24 | zhao_kangg | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-22 | hueyy | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | binhan_04 | 84 | view |
- Topic Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes Can you suggest some possible solutions 84
- The world of work is rapidly changing and the employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hired staff are deficient in fundamental soft skills such as teamwork. There are ...
^^
Line 2, column 647, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng eyes glued to the screen. This causes the lack of face to face interaction and...
^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...GPA instead of only compulsary subjects so as to ensure that they are well- equipped to ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, such as, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42666666667 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9867410705 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6044371455 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.285714286 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212500355705 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628296811642 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484305884559 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115847138902 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353695471133 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.