The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning more than one language and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of important abilities are highly beneficial, such an issue is regraded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that agreeing to learn new languages can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning languages can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of bilingual people, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of improving cognitive abilities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of important skills in the future are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, learning other languages can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of useless skills are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described negligible abilities. Hence, predicted outcomes of endangered languages are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning more than one language far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of linguistic subjects prove the significance of an important ability, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-04 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
| 2018-06-20 | shtom | 58 | view |
- Should wealthy nations help poor countries with food and education or is it the responsibility of poor nations to improve their condition 85
- People attend college or university for many different reasons for example new experiences career preparation or knowledge Why do you think people attend college or university Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 85
- Should individual limit the use of car and use alternative things instead to protect environment 85
- Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Agree or disagree 88
- There are many global problems What is the most pressing problem What solutions would you suggest 88
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71739130435 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17262928177 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647826086957 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8353417927 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.545454545 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305843145903 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964662355146 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684641469303 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16469547872 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866757203037 0.0609392437508 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71739130435 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17262928177 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647826086957 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8353417927 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.545454545 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305843145903 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964662355146 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684641469303 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16469547872 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866757203037 0.0609392437508 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.