Estimate percentage of car trips by purpose and gender of driver, 2005
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of males and females use their cars for eight different goals in the 2005 year.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that both genders commuting to work by car was very much high compared to the other items. Additionally, recreation, bank, running errands and visiting town were the reasons shown the difference between the percentages of girls and boy doing these activities.
In 2015, just over 50% of men travelled to work by car, which was about 13% higher than that of their counterparts for the same intention. By contrast, there was slightly more female than male went on car trips for shopping, with around 17% and 10% respectively. Similarly, the rate of lady and gentleman driving to courses were fairly comparable, at 8% and 12% sequentially.
The four remaining purposes displayed sharply difference in the proportion of each gender use their automobile. The rate of men who made car trips to visit town, at 9%, for recreation, at 11% and these numbers nearly three times more than that of women per aim. While cars were used by roughly 8% to 10% of girls for going to the bank, running errands, and visiting friend, approximately from 3% to 4% of boys drove a car for the same purposes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-05 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 59 | view |
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints and passengers 89
- The table below gives information about the population in Australia and Malaysia in 1980 and 2002 78
- Waste disposal in one European country 2005 2008 59
- The number of international conferences in three cites 89
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82407407407 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70989587721 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.3592448719 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.777777778 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186276346008 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721098679134 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345374120147 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10804077224 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255495827214 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.