Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some people think that having these people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about dangers of committing a crime. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that ex prisoners can finally turn into productive members of the society after being punished for their crimes. As the justice system struggles to address youth crime, i disagree that the most effective way of diverting young people from crime is by talking to these people.
On the one hand, ex-convicts may create a backlash from some teens' perception. People who have previously committed a crime is likely to considered to be untrustworthy. As a result, the youth may have some hesitations in opening themselves up or sharing their personal life with them. Moreover, not all ex-offenders understand the consequences of what they did and break the law once again, not to mention supporting the government to reduce crime rate.
On the other hand, there's no denying that ex-offenders should be given a role in cutting young crime due to the experience they have gained when they were in jail. Having been through what teenagers now experiencing, those who were released from prisons can persuasively confront the young with victims of crime, their families as well as the consequences for themselves and their life chances. Indeed, many initiatives undertaken by prisoners on release have proved to be very useful in preventing the young from becoming criminals. Additionally, ex-convicts know exactly why young people misbehave because they did it themselves. Because of this, they can acquire a portfolio of skills in engaging with teenagers, which may even better than the professionals.
In conclusion, although some are getting better after leaving correctional facilities, letting only them to educate younger generations is completely eradicated. In my opinion governmental departments are as important as ex-convicts in notifying teenagers about the hazards of being criminal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-16 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-16 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | Jenny_6902 | 72 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | daoduong3204 | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-17 | LEEANHTUAN | 67 | view |
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later Some people think that having these people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about dangers of committing a crime Do you agree or disagree 96
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later Some people think that having these people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about dangers of committing a crime Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later Some people think that having these people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about dangers of committing a crime Do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ystem struggles to address youth crime, i disagree that the most effective way of...
^
Line 2, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teens'' or 'teen's'?
Suggestion: teens'; teen's
...onvicts may create a backlash from some teens perception. People who have previously ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
... reduce crime rate. On the other hand, theres no denying that ex-offenders should be ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, may, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36749116608 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02174896367 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618374558304 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8940299034 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.846153846 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220032474108 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078990120992 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700483138837 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131316807519 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478921030754 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.