The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy of France in two years
The circular charts compare the different kinds of energy production of France within ten years. Unit measured in percentage.
A quick look at the both pie charts is quite enough to make it clear that the production of Coal was maximum in 2005 however Coal attained top place in 1995 and Other was the lowest.
Based on the both of descriptions in 1995, Coal had become the most of the energy produced with nearly less than a third, Gas were stood at the second rank through the contribution of less than a third, while Petro had less than a third also. The last two position were taken by Nuclear which has obtained more of one in twenty and Other which had less than one in twenty.
In comparison with 2005, energy establishment in France after five years, there was some increaspancy of Gas values from less than a third to less than a third a few digits upward. Coal from less than a third become less than a third much more, then Nuclear obtained 3.90% value ascend become one in ten and Other raised to less than one in ten. The only unit that got a downgrade was Petro which has almost less than a third to almost a fifth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | Lee Daisy | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | CHÚC | view | |
| 2023-07-02 | Risti | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view |
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009 73
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 73
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 74
- The two pie chart below show some employment pattern in Great Britain in 1992 73
- The three pie charts describe a transition per decade about changes in annual spending by particular UK school The data was measured in percentages 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...hird, while Petro had less than a third also. The last two position were taken by Nu...
^^^^
Line 7, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...hich had less than one in twenty. In comparison with 2005, energy establishment in Fran...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, second, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42380952381 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2219325208 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509523809524 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9565119661 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103662651797 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632095925485 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935104448351 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973998918334 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917101853882 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.