The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all source and renewables in the year 2009.
The pie charts given below compares different sources and renewable that used as electricity generated in two big countries. Germany and France in the year 2009. Data is measured in percentage. In general, it can be seen that the most popular source in Germany was conventional thermal in other hands wind was the biggest percentage of renewables. While, the most contribution source in France was nuclear.
It can be clearly seen that in Germany in the year 2009, conventional thermal contributed the least to the electricity generated sources. Occupied more than half and followed by nuclear as the second highest proportion at 23,0%. By contrast, the most largest sources of electricity generated which France used was nuclear. It got a very large majority. Difference, the second biggest contribution was made by conventional thermal at 10,3%. While, both in Germany or France, renewables was the smallest proportion of all sources. Representing 17,4% in Germany and 13,7% in France.
If we look at the information of renewables in more detail, it is notable that the different of renewables in Germany and France. Biomass made up the biggest part of chart. It got 39,3% and the smallest prop was solar at 6,1%. While, at 80,5%, hydroelectric was the most significant source of renewables and the lowest percentage was similar with Germany.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-14 | destrarastra | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | Kaur mnprit | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010
- The pie chart below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 67
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 63
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 70
- The table below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different diets 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s the biggest percentage of renewables. While, the most contribution source in France...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 247, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'largest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: largest
...t proportion at 23,0%. By contrast, the most largest sources of electricity generated which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 247, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the largest'.
Suggestion: most the largest
...t proportion at 23,0%. By contrast, the most largest sources of electricity generated which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... electricity generated which France used was nuclear. It got a very large majorit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, second, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17889908257 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93302981867 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495412844037 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2849227379 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.5625 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.625 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322613361042 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113736617436 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118949351903 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237579289363 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893767779555 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.