Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are used in many countries The use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power is encouraged Is this trend is a positive or negative development

Nowadays, many developed countries used the fossil fuels such as coal, oil and natural gas at a rapidly pace. However, it caused harm to natural environment and lead to the environment degradation. Considering the global warming and climate change, the use of eco-friendly energy such as solar power or wind is encouraged. I fully agree that this transition would be the positive solution because of its renewable and eco-friendly features.

First of all, demands of fossil fuels is extensively increasing rapidly with the rise of population. However the fossil fuels not only caused the harm to ecosystem, but also has the limitation. Meanwhile, the renewable energy is plentiful and sustainable. Under this circumstance, the government should encourage people to use the alternative source of energy, renewable energy instead of the fossil fuels. Although majority of people claims that the renewable energy does not generate such quantities as the fossil fuels, I believe the communities and experts already found the way to develop this solution.

Last but not least, just minority of countries have the rich sources of fossil fuels. Otherwise, enterprises and facilities must import them from those countries. As I mentioned, the fossil fuels is limited so we cannot use them as much as before. That is why we should have the replacement between fossil fuels and renewable energy. This transition was already happening in few countries. For instance, France has solar panels which converse electricity from sunlight. It is clear that currently both countries reduce polluting the environment and releasing greenhouse gases during operation.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that the alternative source energy, renewable energy such as solar power, water and wind could be replaced and be the mainly energy in the future.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, many developed countries used ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('rapidly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('pace') instead of another adjective.
...ls such as coal, oil and natural gas at a rapidly pace. However, it caused harm to natural env...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...renewable and eco-friendly features. First of all, demands of fossil fuels is...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ng rapidly with the rise of population. However the fossil fuels not only caused the ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd the way to develop this solution. Last but not least, just minority of cou...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... greenhouse gases during operation. In conclusion, I firmly believe that the...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and be the mainly energy in the future.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42307692308 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8743917152 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552447552448 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4256798505 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2352941176 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42647256102 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1133514706 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109750612558 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243608831795 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910461246155 0.056905535591 160% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.