The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organisations.
The bar chart compares five different organizations in terms of their investment in machinery, building, staff training and research.
Overall, organization D and E spend the least money on these items compared to other organizations
The vast majority of money in organization B is spent on staff training and research, at about 1.9 and 1.6 billion euros respectively, which is the highest figure compared to other organizations. By contrast, building is invested the most money by organization A, at approximately €1.5 billion. Over 1 billion euros are spent on machinery in both organizations
Regarding remaining organizations, the figures for investing in building in three organizations are the same, at roughly 1 billion euros. It is noticeble that the amount of money spent on machinery is as much as that of research in organization C, at well-over €1.3 billion. The investment for research in organization D and E are the lowest, at around €0.6 and just over €0.8 billion. respectively
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-10 | phạm khánh linh | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-20 | thanhtam2709 | 92 | view |
| 2021-02-06 | denistran85 | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV ot playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 73
- the table below shows the cinema viewing figures for films by country in millions 80
- Task 1 The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting the total energy from 1971 to 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 51
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full time or part time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anizations, the figures for investing in building in three organizations are the ...
^^
Line 4, column 388, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Respectively
...around €0.6 and just over €0.8 billion. respectively
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34591194969 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36192790437 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553459119497 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.174937456 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.666666667 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122476845851 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085081889752 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519411589671 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930382095682 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543293454686 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.