Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
It is really difficult for people to make a decision on which jobs they want to do in the future as careers depend on various elements both people’s personalities, passions and society’s demand. Moreover, choosing subjects to learn at university is also a controversial problem. While some people argue that it would be better for students to be forced into certain key subjects. I do hold with the idea that everyone should have the right to study whatever they are keen on.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why some people support the idea that students should follow the fixed curriculum of universities with subjects useful in the future such as science or information technology. First of all, after graduating from high school, there are many students do not have enough information about various subjects including their applicability in real work to determine what they should study. Secondly, Science and technology are an extremely important element for the stable growth of a country in this contemporary era. Science in the world especially in developed countries is constantly improved to replace humans creating great things and serve human life again. Therefore, some people argue that society needs talent engineers, scientists more than poets or novelists.
In spite of these arguments, I still believe that students should be free to choose subjects that they are interested in. Firstly, not all students understand clearly their personality because it takes them a long time to define themselves through their experiences so that studying various subjects can help them find out their passions. It cannot be denied that when doing a job you love, you can absolutely achieve the highest result. It is really useless to require a student having a talent in art to studying Maths or Economics. Secondly, nobody can really predict which areas of knowledge will be most useful to society in the future. Besides advances in modern life, humans definitely need music, poems, literature, paintings and so on which enrich their souls. It is the art that makes life colorful. So, limiting subjects for students means blocking their potential talents.
In conclusion, while people differ in opinion about whether students should be allowed to learn key subjects or not, I am favor of the idea that it is good for the comprehensive development of society if students are free to learn different subjects depending on their interests.
- The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 78
- The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 78
- Some people think that children perform better in a single sex school compared to a mixed school To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
- The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 78
- Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers Employers organizations say that in the global market this is necessary to attract the best management talent What are your views 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ermine what they should study. Secondly, Science and technology are an extremely ...
^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to key'
Suggestion: to key
...her students should be allowed to learn key subjects or not, I am favor of the idea...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74116307432 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2273893766 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.111111111 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344511118428 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954801694977 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073840446825 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204533868915 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420889385497 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.