The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table provides promotion of different category of things that five respective countries have expended money for them.
As table illustrates, Turkey has the first place in spending money for food/drinks/tobacco and leisure/ education. However, Italy grasp the first place in clothing and footwear. Furthermore, except Sweden, there are marginal differences in promotion of expenditure for clothing and footwear among Turkey, Spain and Ireland. By considering second column of table it is obvious that after Turkey, four countries; Ireland, Spain, Italy and Sweden have second to fifth place respectively. The last column shows that first to fifth place were related to Turkey, Sweden, Italy, Ireland and Spain respectively in leisure and education.
The last thing is about data in rows of table. It is obvious that food, drink and tobacco had priority for all five countries in spending money for them and after then clothing/footwear and leisure/education had the second and third places respectively among countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Nguyễn Thạch Bảo Ngọc | view | |
| 2023-01-26 | Nguyễn Thạch Bảo Ngọc | view | |
| 2022-08-03 | rachell | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | nhattram39 | 11 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport
- Many governments think that economic progress is most important goal some people however think that other types of progress and equally important for a country 84
- In many countries the amount of crime is increasing What do you think are the main causes of crime and how can we deal with those 67
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Describe the information in the table and make comparisons where appropriate 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Italy) must be used with a third-person verb: 'grasps'.
Suggestion: grasps
... and leisure/ education. However, Italy grasp the first place in clothing and footwea...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59615384615 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12422903047 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570512820513 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.0623124246 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.125 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.086478002324 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434378110864 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484936061042 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836406148152 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496202010621 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.