The presented statistical table compares two genders and five age segments in terms of their proportion getting involved in cycling in a particular area in 2011.
Overall, it is evident that bicycles were used by both gender and all age sections in this town. Moreover, although the fluctuations were observed, the ratio of bicyclist generally decreased due to age in 2011.
Turning into detail, it is witnessed that the number of women riding a bicycle was higher than that of men in all age groups. Particularly, female and male who are under 9 shared the similar number of member taking part in riding bikes, which accounted for 51,3 % and 50,3%, respectively. In 10-24 sector, while that percentage of female showed a mild decline, the figure of men cycling plunged, which was 2-time lower than that of mentioned group.
Regarding to older groups, in 25-39 category, the rate of bicyclists continuously fell dramatically in both gender, which occupied 17,1% of women, followed by a nearly-ten-percent number of male. Turning into 40-59 group, those numbers dropped slightly to 12,3% and 8,0%, respectively. In contrast, the figure of elderly using bikes showed an upward trend, which grew by over 10% in total.
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode a bicycle in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Organized tours to remote places and communities is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment 89
- People continue to commit crimes even after being punished Why does this happen How can crime be prevented 90
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, regarding, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15577889447 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82602193905 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653266331658 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6570499482 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128469643173 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518914126225 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304180330175 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765841440643 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293131757869 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.