communal online encyclopedias
While the passage talks about the drawbacks of communal online encyclopedias as compared to the traditional encyclopedia books, the speaker talks about how these are misconceptions by prejudiced academicians and how communal online encyclopedias are better than traditional encyclopedia books.
First, it is true that the communal online encyclopedias have errors in them. But, are traditional encyclopedia books any exception? Be it online or traditional offline books, it is impossible to find a source that is perfectly accurate. Moreover, it is easier to correct misinformation in the online encyclopedias where as in the traditional books, the inaccurate information will persist for years.
Second, the passage states that the communal online encyclopedias are susceptible to be fabricated by hackers and unscrupulous users. However, these encyclopedias are protected in a way that the changes are verified by special editors to make sure that no wrong information or fabricated information is entered. Moreover, the indisputable facts in the encyclopedia are not given editing rights to the users.
Finally, the passage claims that the communal online encyclopedias cover only trivial or popular topics to a great depth. However, as the books are written by a group of academicians, they may not cover a great range of topics or interests of the users. In contrast, as the communal online encyclopedias are written by a large number of users, they cover a great diversity of topics that can cater to a wide range of users and this is the strongest advantage over offline books.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-16 | TiOluwani97 | 87 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | keisham | 83 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | Dat_Nguyen | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-28 | MotherAstronaut | 85 | view |
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 16
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 66
- The following is a letter to the editor of the Waymarsh Times Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work the commute now takes 59
- Archaeologists have long thought that an artifact called the pemchint was used by Dodecan people solely as a musical instrument Pemchints consist of hollowed pieces of bone shell or wood that are tied together with long straps When whirled in the air the 60
- Chevalier memoir 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ional offline books, it is impossible to find a source that is perfectly accurate...
^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...information in the online encyclopedias where as in the traditional books, the inaccurat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 320, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nal online encyclopedias are written by a large number of users, they cover a great diversity of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, while, in contrast, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43548387097 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26415711082 2.5805825403 126% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463709677419 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5958071629 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.545454545 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.56250429868 0.272083759551 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.23704181614 0.0996497079465 238% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163399854438 0.0662205650399 247% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.375566662775 0.162205337803 232% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857519585833 0.0443174109184 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.8541721854 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.