Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of parental responsibilities and its corresponding impacts sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of children's behavior is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that parental supervision can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, responsible parents can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of children's positive activity, as well as girls' behaviors are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered boys' emotional reactions. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both pupil's behaviors, and parents' social responsibilities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, children's behavior management might increase the consequences of well-behaved adults. Moreover, fundamental aspects of mothers' supervision could relate to this reality that the demerits of fathers' controls pertain to rude children. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of rule-breaking children is correlated negatively with irresponsible parents. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of parental studies.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of parents' contribution far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of behaving positively prove the significance of good children but also pinpoint children's educational strategies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-09 | Janabakhshi | 94 | view |
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy Is it a blessing or curse 90
- There are both advantages and disadvantages of company workers accessing their own products and services Discuss 58
- Fuzzy Agent based model framework for BIM Adoption for Facility Management in the New Zealand Construction Industry from Stakeholders Collaboration Perspective 61
- There are both advantage and disadvantage of company workers accessing their own products and services Discuss 78
- There are both advantage and disadvantage of company workers accessing their own products and services Discuss 85
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98804780876 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40617179798 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673306772908 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1720644235 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166775640362 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572803901926 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325352860714 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956886540823 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186920176929 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 11.5310837438 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98804780876 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40617179798 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673306772908 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1720644235 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166775640362 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572803901926 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325352860714 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956886540823 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186920176929 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 11.5310837438 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.