The chart below gives the information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future
Given is the bar chart comparing the comparison among 3 regions (Africa, Asia and Latin America) with the whole world about the growth of population in the past and in the future (1950, 2000 and 2030).
Overall, percentage of the population living in urban areas had an upward trend in 2000 compared with 1950 in all regions and in the world as a whole. It is predicted to go up beyond by 2030.
As can be observed, in the year of 1950, Latin America ranked first with the highest population at more than 40% followed by Asia with 18% city population whereas Africa experienced the lowest figure with one tenth of the total population which was living in cities. As the time passed, in 2000, there was a boom in the population of Latin America which reached at 70% and higher than that of wholeworld about 20%, at the same time, the proportion of Africa and Asia was similar at 39% urban population.
Finally, Latin America’s percentage of population continued to get a highest figure which is forecast to reach a peak at 80% in the future year 2030. The urban population of wholeworld stand in the second place and Asia in the third place (60% and 57% respectively), last is Africa’s population at only 50%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | nguyenanhquan | 11 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | nguyenanhquan | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | TLan168 | view | |
| 2023-07-30 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ia was similar at 39% urban population. Finally, Latin America’s percentage of p...
^^^
Line 4, column 68, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...rcentage of population continued to get a highest figure which is forecast to rea...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, second, so, third, whereas, in the second place, in the third place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60648148148 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54674659318 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513888888889 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.7736328237 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.142857143 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8571428571 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8571428571 5.23603664747 226% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184003620774 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096579192651 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485767285006 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133138457283 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468627361035 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.