In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
I believe that it’s impossible to make a remarkable contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within the essential and basic fields, such as physics and math. Still, other fields such as computer engineering, art, and literature, the major contribution could be done without precedent’s significant achievements.
For the science and technology field, there is always existing someone pioneering in the field and make a tremendous contribution to it, then followers could further evolve and improve based on previous achievements. And that could explain scientists and technicians could make a breakthrough as pioneering characters without precedent huge achievements. Because in these fields evolution, there must be a considerable contribution first and that is developed under the condition without any past achievements within that field. For example, until Wright brother’s achievements, we have no way to fly in the sky. Before them, there is obviously no significant findings or contribution to the plane field. After them, based on those achievements, scientists and technicians have further developed larger and faster planes that could carry more than a hundred people to cross the sea and forms the dense transportation network today.
The naysayers may argue that plenty of technologies we use today are based on previous science achievements. Certainly, for those are basic and classic rules such as physics and math, we can’t deny that experts couldn’t make a significant contribution unless remarkable achievements existed. For example, the computers’ invention by IBM is based on semiconductor development which is also a breakthrough based on the laws of physics. Therefore, it is clear that the classic rule plays an essential role that every related field relies on and developed according to them.
Nevertheless, except basic rules, it doesn’t mean we must rely on precedent’s effort to make further remarkable contributions in any field. For literature and art field, the creativity is often unlimited and unique, most of the major contribution is not dependent on ancestors’ achievements. For instance, Shakespeare made the best well-known literature contribution and van Gogh made his painting distinctly. Therefore, art and literature field are generally independent of others’ contributions.
In conclusion, we can make a breakthrough or significant contribution to any field unless they are classic or basic rules that have to be excavated first, then many related fields could develop accordingly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sovendo Talapatra | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Jonginn | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed Reading Course has greatly improved productivity One graduate of the course was able to read a 500 page report in only two hours another graduate rose from an a 58
- Creative artist should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas in words pictures music or film in whichever way they wish There should be no government restrictions on what they do To what extent do you agree or disagree with this op 80
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 59
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership 54
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your posi 58
Comments
While a nation sustains a…
While a nation sustains a country for decades, it needs a serious prospect to handle, I believe not only the achievements of its rulers, or scientists also the welfare of the general citizens.
To broadcast the nation, the achievement and the award of the world can promote the nation’s prestige. If the professor wins the award of the Nobel Prize, their country must be famous in coincidence since the news will broadcast the winner’s country and indicate the nation’s benefits. Also, the tourist will enhance their willingness to visit the nation and public the nation’s beauty. Furthermore, the artist who wins the award and is famous in the world might promote their country to elaborate its famous. While the reporter asked about their country the artist can introduce their nations’ beautiful sights and delicious foods, also comfort hotels. Since, the achievement of the famous, the nation’s reputation will be greater. However, the reputation cannot represent a whole nation that the citizen might plague with the plight and worry about the future. Just like in China, although China has a lot of famous people to promote their country, some people, living in China, are always poverty and hungry as usual. If the nation doesn’t care about the citizens’ welfare, the famous represented is not as useful as people think. Even the publics will fight with the government can try to fight with their rights and eager a better life to live. On the other hands, Japan always aware of their people’s welfare and give them huge benefits to their elder to allow them to live comfortably. Also in Denmark, even though people have to pay the high tax, their welfare is the best in the world so the nation will be greater thanks to the good welfare of their citizens. Most important, the government should cultivate some elite can approve them to go abroad to elaborate the nation’s benefits, also enact a law to prove their citizens’ right. Just like the government can through the famous, from the famous person’s broadcast, to add more tourists to enhance tourism and earn more money. So the government can use the money not only to promote their international sights and help more poverty people keep far from poor and approve better welfare to people to make the nation become better.
In conclusion, to let the nation become better, the achievements of its professionals and the welfare of people are all very important. The government needs to complement each other to pursue a more conducive society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 72, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'pioneers'.
Suggestion: pioneers
...field, there is always existing someone pioneering in the field and make a tremendous cont...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fields'' or 'field's'?
Suggestion: fields'; field's
...ent huge achievements. Because in these fields evolution, there must be a considerable...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72135416667 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33563458162 2.79657885939 119% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5078125 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1358199405 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.235294118 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5882352941 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 5.21951772744 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276360613768 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992141387296 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895679663601 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178469865988 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706223673397 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.1639044944 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.