The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
The pie chart indicates the average household spending in Japan and Malaysia with respect to five important categories in 2010.
Overall, it is noticeable that householders in both countries expended the largest proportion of their income for just three categories-housing, food and other goods and services.
In 2010, the expenditure for other goods and services held the lion’s share in Japanese households, which was merely higher than that in Malaysian ones, a difference of 3%. In terms of food, the figures for both countries shared a striking similarity, at 24% and 27% for Japan and Malaysia respectively, making it hold the runner-up, in comparison with the others. While Malaysian spenders allocated the largest proportion for housing, which accounted for 34% in the total shares, a reverse pattern was seen to Japanese consumers, with just 21%.
In the year of 2010, the percentage of pouring money on transport in Japan was twice as much as its counterpart-in Malaysian. Spending on health was the smallest category. In Japan, it made up only 6% of the total, which was 3% higher than that in Malaysia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-18 | vuongthaolinh | 85 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | huongab123 | view | |
| 2023-06-19 | mykhanh | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | saminhsn | view | |
| 2023-01-14 | Kaito Mori | view |
- The chart above gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966 1986 and 2006 78
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 82
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 78
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Children s education is expensive In some countries the government pays some of or all of the costs Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00488673365 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598901098901 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1140254917 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220303163761 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103246081071 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120555479719 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162624282243 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141431320263 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.