Some people think that the fictional violence portrayed on television is harmless entertainment.
Others disagree and think that it encourages violent behaviour.
Discuss both these view and give your own opinion.
These days, television plays a crucial role in people’s daily life, from pervading worldwide information to providing entertainment or even communicating with others via a smart screen. It lies in the fact that there are many cons of using television, and one of the biggest problems is said to be fictional violent, which can encourage violent behavior.
On the one hand, the notion of those fictional images leading to actual violent actions is, in my opinion, partially true. It is undeniable that as TV is becoming smarter, more and more children who are not mature enough to control themselves are spending more and more time on the couch fixing their eyes on the screen. With a large amount of workload, parents tend to allow their children to use television without parental control. Therefore, those children can approach every unfiltered television content. Finally, the fictional violence portrayed obsesses them and gradually makes their behavior uncontrollable. Nevertheless, it is obvious that almost all action movies now have restriction for ages under 18. It means that although children can easily access TV, those movies are not popular and easy to seek. Even if they suddenly find them on the Internet, it is difficult for them to open it. On youtube, for example, when people try to get access to age-restricted movies, they need to connect with a Gmail account that is eligible to watch.
On the other hand, my viewpoints on the matter are the benefits of action images outweigh their drawbacks. It is no doubt that those images excite humans’ brains and consequently help people relaxed, and the gists of this satisfied feeling come from thorny, dramatic details in each action movie. According to experts, violence in movies is unable to affect mature people; therefore, watching violent movies probably does not affect them. Moreover, the world’s economy relies strongly on this movie genre in this day and age on account of the fact that dominant individuals are keen on watching this kind of movie. Therefore, not only the fans of action movies but also the producers and movie markets would move backward without the appearance of violent images and movies.
To put it in a nutshell, although this is an ongoing debate that often divides opinions, I incentivize the development of fictional violence portrayed on television and suggest parents take care of their children more meticulously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-25 | CyborgTheBest | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-10 | chitedeptrai | 93 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | CyborgTheBest | 82 | view |
- Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend It should be limited To what extent do you agree 89
- Some people think that the fictional violence portrayed on television is harmless entertainment Others disagree and think that it encourages violent behaviour Discuss both these view and give your own opinion 93
- Populations 73
- Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend It should be limited To what extent do you agree 75
- In many countries children are engaged in different kinds of paid work Some people regard this as completely wrong while others consider it a valuable work experience important for learning and taking responsibility What is your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e children can approach every unfiltered television content. Finally, the fiction...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, kind of, no doubt, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18020304569 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74312884415 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565989847716 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9479875027 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.058823529 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1764705882 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13115335901 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416171373423 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403894680757 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924634940805 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443907226776 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.