The chart below gives the information on the percentage of british people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 to 2010.
The given bar chart depicts the information on the percentage of british people who spend money during the 20years of period. We can seen that, Donation in 1990 is greater than in 2010, however the patterns of giving money is different before and after age 50.
Overall, more british gave money to charity in1990 than they did in 2010. However, People over 50years old did just the opposite and a fewer younger bitish donated to charity than the adults did both in these years.
To begin with, In the year 1990, people who were between 18-25 age range giving money to charity which was approximatley 17%. For the same age range the percenatge of british people was about 7% in the year 2010. The british people whose age between 26-35 giving to charity was about 31% in the year 1990 and nearly 25% in the year 2010.
Moving further, In 1990, 42% of the 36-50 age group made charitable dontaions, and this figure is the highest on the chart. In 2010, 35% of the same age group spend money in charity. In 1990, the donations declined for the 51-65 age range people which was 35%. While in 2010, The donations rose among the 51-65 age group from nearly 40%. During the year 1990-2010, the percentage of british people giving charity eas declined.
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication Do the Benifits of this outweigh the problems 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Modern buildings change the character and apperance of town and cities The government should insist and new buildings can be built in traditional styles to protect cultural identity To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'see' or 'be seen'?
Suggestion: see; be seen
...ey during the 20years of period. We can seen that, Donation in 1990 is greater than ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65765765766 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13456486854 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490990990991 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4696802554 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1666666667 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.577801181913 0.215688989381 268% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226865139037 0.103423049105 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126017145685 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.339672595516 0.15604864568 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132404095795 0.0819641961636 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.73 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.