tpo14-integration writing
In terms of whether salvage logging has a good effect on the economy. The reading and listening are contradictory to each other.
Firstly, the writer makes the pints that if the dead trees don’t remove from the damaged forest so new trees can’t grow easily in the damaged forests because of lack of space. However, the professor demonstrates a different idea that cleansing up the trees will cause a lack of Neutrogena which is very vital for trees to be growth. So by removing them, they reduce the soil features.
Secondly, the belief in the reading is that dead trees can be a place for harmful insects which can damage other trees in the forest but the lecturer says that somehow these dead trees can provide a good habitat for birds and some other insects which search for some places to have their nets. As a result, it is not a good idea to remove them.
Finally, the author states that salvage logging can provide a job for local people. in contrast, the speaker refutes that. She believes that these trees can remove by big vehicles and using technology to clean them up or some outsider which has better experience can do this job, as a result, it doesn’t give the opportunity to local people for the job. In addition to that this kind of job is temporary.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your 70
- Some people like to buy a piece of technological device as soon as it is available in the market Other people prefer to buy it after it has been adopted by many people Which do you prefer 57
- The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past 76
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do 60
- Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 65
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 12
No. of Words: 230 250
No. of Characters: 1015 1200
No. of Different Words: 125 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.894 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.413 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.249 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 66 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 44 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 20 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 11 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.06 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.359 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.359 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.114 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4