The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Teaching the students,is an important task and must be done meticulously. Properly taught students generally, turn out to be fruitful in their careers. But the question arises, how should one be taught and what teaching practices should be followed by any teacher. The statement given in the issue task praises positive actions of teaching and ignoring the negetive ones. In my perspective, simply sating the style of teaching any situation should not be done. It depends primarily on the environment of the place and behavior of students in deciding whether above statement should be followed or not. I have one statement in support, one statement in contrast while third one as an ambivalent statement concerning above statement.
First of all, praising positive actions will galvanize any individual to perform better. A recent study by a university in Australia has suggested that praising someone after they complete their task, leads to release of certain chemicals in their brain which motivates them and make them more attentive towards their teacher. These acts can include, applauding the student, motivating them throughout their task, keeping a check on them and helping them solve their problems whenever they get struck. These tricks helps student as their curosity increases and they become more meticulous and this makes them more motivated towards the next step.
In contrast, only praising positive students will not be always fruitful. As stated in the statement, igonoring negetive actions may certainly lead to negetive affect if the action is completely ignored. For example, while teaching in a class, if a teacher notices certain hostile answers which may hurt sentiments or others or are wrong on moral perspectives towards the nation or any organization, being brought up by any student while explaining any answer, It is the duty of that teacher to correct these negetive answers at that very instant. If the above stated suggestion is not followed, other students will start mimicking the same behaviour. If the concept is wrong, not only one student but the whole class will follow this example. This might become rampant and if not controlled may lead to blatant mistakes being done by students. Hence depending on the situation, it sholud be made necessary sometimes to point out the mistakes of students.
The third statement I would present is quite ambivalent. It depends on the age group and environment of student in which he is teaching. For instance, we cannot treat a twenty years old man and a five year old child in the sam manner. The twenty years old man is highly mature compared to the child. Completely Ignoring negetive actions in case of child may make the reality of world obscure while only focusing on negetive actions and being too strict on him might imbalance his way of thinking and make him a person with a dubious character. Again, for elder students, their circle of peers matters a lot. Every peer group will have different traits. Some being too stubborn while others being innocent. Based on circumstances both the group need to be treated differently. For a negetive and arrogant peer group their should be a proper balance of how negetive and postive actions are being praised unlike statement given in the task.
Concluding, I would like to say how important it is to have a balance between both negetive and positive actions while teaching depending primarily on the circumstances in which teaching is being done and the age group of student in which he or she is.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 62
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The resul 72
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 68
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , is
Teaching the students,is an important task and must be done meti...
^^^
Line 3, column 846, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...latant mistakes being done by students. Hence depending on the situation, it sholud b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, so, third, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2957.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 583.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07204116638 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91379618374 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6547007505 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476843910806 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 914.4 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.880965411 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.965517241 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1034482759 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.37931034483 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145095444179 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431623801514 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504134109196 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958727132937 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358204265048 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.