One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that exploring universe is vastly expensive which needs to be spent to put halter on obstacles that exist in the world, and it is only possible to decline the number of such missions while others oppose it.I completely in favour of former view point.This essay would discuss both sides in following paragraphs.
To commence with, there are deluges of arguments in favour of my stance.The most preponderant one is that number of masses specially who are under poverty line, struggling with starvation.They do not have food to eat, place to live and clothes to wear, at the same time research on space is worthlessness for them but if this money is utilised to solve problems of layman, it will reduce poverty for many years because space research cannot only contribute to put burden on the shoulder of authority, but also leads to numerous other catastrophic effects namely; poverty-stricken people are unable to provide education to their wards which become barrier in the way of employment.Consequently, they choose wrong path which leads them into the world of crime. Needless to say, investing money on orbit exploration is useless until such problems are not controlled.
Furthermore, another pivotal aspect of aforementioned propositions is that it is only likely to meaningless because it is proved that at the moment, earth is the only place where life is possible, but several disasters like global warming, pollution, hurricanes and extreme weather conditions are threatening existence of living organisms, and that must not be ignored. So, countries should devote a great chunk of money to tackle these hurdles. It can be done only by reducing the cost of exploring the space. For instance, the study results published by the government of Australia in March 2014 and April 2016 clearly indicate that India invested almost 100 millions dollars to send their astronaut while 28% of total population slept hungry. Hence, it is apparent that why it is needed to reduce space researching programs.
However, a section of the society contradicts the above-said view by providing some justification. They reckon that spending money for exploring other planets is the need of time because population is increasing alarmingly. In coming future, new generations will have no space yo live, to grow food in that condition other planets can be used to stay lively. Apart from it, solutions of many fatal deceases are found from orbit exploration. NASA has witnessed that there is one alien planet which has probability to reveal plethora of mysteries that are beyond of human power. Therefore, it is admissible to use great chunk of fortune for researching on space.
To conclude, having ponderd over above-stated it is crystal clear that although investment on space projects can sum up many mysterious things, it will be foolish task to ignore human problem. So, minimising number of missions is the best aid to sort out such issues.
- Some people say modern innovations bring lot of problem than benefits Do you agree or disagree 95
- Some people say it is a good idea for all employees to wear a uniform at work To what extent do you agree or disagree 66
- Employers should give their workers at least one month holiday a year as it makes them to do better at their job To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Many people say that globalisation and the growing number of multinational companies have a negative effect on the environment Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 w 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...of such missions while others oppose it.I completely in favour of former view poi...
^
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...mpletely in favour of former view point.This essay would discuss both sides in follo...
^^^^
Line 2, column 73, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ges of arguments in favour of my stance.The most preponderant one is that number of...
^^^
Line 2, column 189, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...overty line, struggling with starvation.They do not have food to eat, place to live ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ms of layman, it will reduce poverty for many years because space research cannot...
^^
Line 2, column 682, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Consequently
...become barrier in the way of employment.Consequently, they choose wrong path which leads the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 708, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to wrong'
Suggestion: to wrong
...of employment.Consequently, they choose wrong path which leads them into the world of...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns of many fatal deceases are found from orbit exploration. NASA has witnessed th...
^^
Line 4, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on. NASA has witnessed that there is one alien planet which has probability to re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, apart from, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 13.1623246493 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 41.998997996 198% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2549.0 1615.20841683 158% => OK
No of words: 498.0 315.596192385 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11847389558 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92811366161 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 176.041082164 164% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580321285141 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 803.7 506.74238477 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 179.073614402 49.4020404114 362% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 159.3125 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.125 20.7667163134 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224639249566 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067016181739 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546357255725 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117579738071 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289621006918 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 78.4519038076 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 9.78957915832 276% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 10.7795591182 250% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.