The bar chart shows the amount spent on digital games in the USA and China from 2010 to 2017 and the pie chart shows global spending on these games in 2017.
The bar chart compares how much money people in the USA and China spent on digital gaming between 2010-2017, while pie chart reflects the global totals spent on mobile, console and PC games.
Overall, it is clear that gaming became a more lucrative industry over the period, with massive growth in China in particular. Worldwide, mobiles accounted for the largest market share in 2017.
According to the first chart, in 2010, Chinese people spent around 8 billion dollars on games, which was approximately half the figure of the USA. Although spending increased steadily in America over the next 7 years, the rise was much more marked in China until by 2016, gamers there were spending slightly more than their US counterparts. By 2017, this figure had more than tripled to $28 billion, surpassing the $25 billion spent in the USA.
Globally, in 2017, the two countries accounted for almost half of the gaming market revenue. In that year, people around the world spent over 110 billion dollars on this pastime, with 42% ($46.1 billion) going on mobile games, 31% on consoles and the rest on PC versions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-18 | NeutronnzZ | 95 | view |
| 2020-04-18 | NeutronnzZ | 78 | view |
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full time or part time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele 73
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at l 90
- The line graph shows the rates of smoking in Someland for men and women between 1960 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91443850267 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38287953992 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609625668449 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7402223955 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30933290651 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130497673835 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120512210455 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199073696939 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138180509843 0.0819641961636 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.